" I am a Universal Prophet.  I came to You Moors because you need me the most."
                                                              --Prophet Noble Drew Ali

Quo Warranto


Horizontal Divider 12

Averment of Jurisdiction / Quo Warranto 

                                     Horizontal Divider 12
A Quo Warranto action is a direct action on the holder of an Office, e.g. A Judge, questioning their qualifications to hold such office, and therefore his warrant and authority to occupy said office. Administrative Judges can not exercise Judicial powers which according to the 'Supreme Law of the Land' (Constitution). They do not have a Delegation of Authority Order (D.O.A.O) to do so. Thus, they are incompetent to exercise Judicial Powers; In essence, they lack yet are in want of the proper Jurisdiction.


Supreme Court Rulings (Stare Decisis) on such matter Jurisdiction:

  1. All orders or judgments issued by a judge in a Court of limited jurisdiction must contain the findings of the Court showing that the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction, not allegations that the Court has jurisdiction.  In re Jennings, 68 Ill. 2d 125, 368 N.E.2d 864 (1977) ("in a special statuary proceeding an order must contain the jurisdictional findings prescribed by statute").
  2. Lack of Federal Jurisdiction can not be waived or overcome by agreement of parties - Griffin v. Matthews, 310 F supra 341, 342 (1969)
  3.  Want of Jurisdiction may not be cured by consent of parties. Industrial Addition Association v. C.I.R., 323 US 310, 313

Horizontal Divider 12

Lawful Avernment of Jurisdiction/Quo Warrantos were sent to the following Public Servants ([Alleged] Judges, Clerks, Corporate Chief Executive Officers, Etc., and not one has been answered nor has any of them been responded to within the allotted time within said "Quo Warrantos", and are now in "Default":

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (MARYLAND), et. al.
  1. Pamela L. North - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  2. Robert P. Duckworth, et. al. - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, et. al.
  1. Wendy A. Weeks (Alleged) Special Counsel - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION, et. al.
  1. John T. Kuo (Administrator) - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, etl al.
  1. Michael Helms (Director) and Kevin Webb (Assistant Director) - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, et.al.
  1. Mary J. Abrams (Clerk) - Quo Warranto (Scroll Down) / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, et. al.
  1. Ellen Lipton Hollander - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CHARLES COUNTY (MARYLAND), et.al. - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  • Sharon l. Hancock (Clerk) 
  • Amy J. Bragunier (County Administrator)  
  • Robert C. Nalley (Chief Magi) 
  • Helen I. Harrington (Associate Magi) 
  • Jerome R. Spencer (Associate Magi) 
DISTRICT COURT FOR CHARLES COUNTY (MARYLAND), et.al.- Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  • Patrick H. Loveless (Administrative Clerk)  
  • Brenda L. Giammerino (County Clerk) 
  • Hilda I. Gilroy ([Alleged] Commissioner) 
  • Alfie Bartley ([Alleged] Administrative Commissioner) 
  • W. Louis Hennessy (Administrator) 
  • Kenneth A. Talley (Administrator) 
 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS E. PYLE, et. al.
  1. Thomas E. Pyles  - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
SPRINT/NEXTEL CORPORATION, et. al. - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  1. Daniel R. Hesse (Chief Executive Officer) 
  2. Joseph J. Euteneuer (Chief Financial Officer) 
ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC, et.al.. - Quo Warranto  / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  1. Kirk Ronald Moquin (Co-Chief Executive Officer) 
  2. Mark Thompson (Co-Chief Executive Officer) 
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
FEDERAL STUDENT AID
DEFAULT RESOLUTION GROUP

  1. Arne Duncan (Secretary of Education) - Notice of Default / DEFAULT ON DISCOVERY /Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et.al. - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  1. John G. Stumpf (Chairman, President, Chief Executive Off icer)- DEFAULT ON DISCOVERY 
  2. Avid Modjtabai (Senior Executive Vice President of Consumer Lending) - Quo Warranto 
  3. Shelley Ramsey (Research Remediation Representative) - Quo Warranto
AUTOVEST, LLC., et. al. - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  1. James E. Blasius (Owner) 
  2. William Godfrey (Representative) - Quo Warranto
DOMINION LAW ASSOCIATES, PLC, et.al. - Quo Warranto / DEFAULT JUDGMENT

                              Horizontal Divider 12

Definition per Black’s Law 4th Edition

Averment – A positive statement of facts, in opposition to argument or inference. An offer to prove a plea, or pleading. The concluding part of a plea, replication, or other pleading, containing new affirmative matter, by which the party offers or declares himself “ready to verify.”

Quo Warranto – In old English practice. A writ, in the nature of a writ of right for the king, against him who claimed or usurped any office, franchise, or liberty, to inquire by what authority he supported his claim, in order to determine the right. It lay also in case of non-user, or long neglect of a franchise, or misuser or abuse of it; being a writ commanding the defendant to show by what warrant he exercises such a franchise, having never had any grant of it, or having forfeited it by neglect of abuse.


Everyone must request the Averment from Administrative Courts (Traffic, Municipal, etc.). They are All Non-Judicial Tribunals and Entities.

It must be made clear that all corporations are creatures of a constitution. At Northwest Amexem – Northwest Africa – North America – The North Gate the Constitution that all corporations are a creature of is the American Constitution adopted for the United States of America 1791 which in truth is the Union States of America. 
There are many United States. There is the United States of Mexico, the United States of Venezula, The United States of Brazil, The United States of Cuba, etc.

North America is the United States of Morocco or United States of Al Moroc.

All federal and state governments are bound to uphold the American Constitution pursuant to Article VI of said Constitution where it affirms the following:

‘This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuant thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges, in every State, shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several States legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound, by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

The above affirms without doubt or contradiction that all public servants of every federal and states government are bound to the American Constitution and therefore all agencies of said federal and state government must have a “Delegation of Authority”.

All “Courts” must have a “Delegation of Authority” pursuant to Article III, Section I of the American Constitution where it affirms the following:

“The judicial powers of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts, as Congress may, from time to time, ordain and establish.”

The above affirms there MUST be a “Delegation of Authority” from Congress for any “Court” to exist with judicial powers outside of the “One Supreme Court”.

That being said, below is a blanket “Averment of Jurisdiction / Quo Warranto” to be sent “Certified Mail” by the People to any and all federal and states agencies. The Writ demands a full accounting of the public servant to show by what authority the People are being infringed upon.

It must also be of note that whenever an Averment of Jurisdiction / Quo Warranto is submitted to the entity – the command is demanding not just a “Delegation of Authority” but also complete information regarding said entities “Bond”. The “Bond” information is indemnity insurance and all corporations must have indemnity insurance in order to operate in commerce.

When any alleged government agency states that they have a blanket bond, not individual bonds on the public servant, they have just let you know they are operating as a for profit foreign European private corporation and they are NOT government.

Pursuant to the American Constitution, all public servants must be bonded. They are the only ones who can act, engage in action of any kind therefore their actions, i.e. performance, is bonded to ensure that they always protect the People.

That is their only function!!!

 
COLLECTIVE INSTRUCTIONS:

.
As such it is requested that if any of the People submit an Averment of Jurisdiction / Quo Warranto to advise us of the following:

  1. Who the writ was sent to
  2. When it was sent
  3. What was the expected date of reply
  4. Was the Delegation of Authority provided and on what date
  5. If Delegation of Authority provided please scan and send a copy for examination

The email address to send this information to is: gsnama7@gmail.com – in the subject line please put: Averment / Quo Warranto.

NOTE: This Above Site is for the People to review and determine if the required “Delegation of Authority” was provided. If the writ was submitted already there is no need to submit it again as jurisdiction was never proven you can move on to your next step. This process eliminates duplication of effort and maximization of the energy of the People.

BLANKET Averment of Jurisdiction / Quo Warranto

 "As Prophet Noble Drew Ali said"I love my people and I would like to see them come out of darkness into marvelous light." 

Horizontal Divider 12

     In matters involving Court appearances, hearings, etc., it has already been established that all judicial power is vested in one Court -- the Supreme Court, and to any Courts the Congress may from time to time, delegate such powers to, which is done with a "Delegation Of Authority Order (DOAO)", and of course it is in written form.
.
    There are three things placed before the Court
as a matter of Protocol, prior to Adjudication.
. 
1.  Status: (i.e. your social standing in the community; are you a flesh and blood being - a  Natural Person, or a Corporate Person, an artificial construct).  2.  Jurisdiction / Venue: (i.e. where are you? is it a lawful Court Room or Tribunal?;  does it have Personum jurisdiction? (jurisdiction over the person [back to status which determines that]);  Is there jurisdiction over the Subject Matter(s)?  Does this court have jurisdiciton over the Territory? Territorial Jurisdiction over the place where the alleged crime or civil violaton occurred?  and, do they (the court or any officers of the court) have the capacity to rule over such?  
    
     If you let them get pass on Status, and you let them pass on both Status and Jurisdiction / Venue, then the court moves to  3.  Adjudication:  (determination of penalties, punishment, sentencing, including court fees and fines).

     When you are dealing with the "Courts", you must ask for their Delegation of Authority in written form to be placed on the record, for the record and entered into the record as evidence, as proof of their Authority.  It they do not produce it, they don't have it, and technically the matter is closed.  "Ask and you shall receive".

     You can, and ought to "Ask" (and you must be answered) for their Delegation of Authority, particularly and especially in lieu of the fact that most of the Courts, or Tribunals you encounter are Ministerial, and/or Inferior, lacking jurisdiction and lacking Judicial Authority.  As well, you ask for the Judge/Magistrates' "Oath of Office" (which indicates their agreement, responsibility, and obligation, taken under oath to support the Constituion, as the constitution is where their Authority is derived).  If they give you the run around in regards to acquiring this Oath, which is public information, you can stop the chasing and ask for it.  You ask for it, and for the DOAO, in a "Writ of Discovery" (along with any other requests for information), or,  you can ask for the DOAO independently (which is best).  This request is called an "Averment of Jurisdicton", of which we have updated its use and coupled it with the "Quo Warranto.  An updated example is enclosed in the Word Document attached below, for your review, study, and application.  Also, an example of a Writ In The Nature of Discovery" can be found on the "Writs of Freedom Page" on this site for your review and inner standing.   

Averment of Jurisdiction - Version 4


Website Builder